What your result means
At structured listening, your practices are likely to be:
Voice
Regular and planned
Understanding
Comparative across groups or topics
Action
Leaders integrate into plans with accountability
Communication
Some deliberate feedback loops, slow progress
3 steps to move from Structured Listening to Proactive Listening
At the Structured stage, listening becomes more deliberate and regular.
Organisations introduce controlled mechanisms such as annual surveys, staff councils, or parent forums. Leaders demonstrate a willingness to listen, but often within boundaries they are comfortable with, asking about safe topics, avoiding areas that may produce difficult truths.
While data is collected and compared across groups, responses are uneven and often slow, leaving stakeholders uncertain whether change will follow. If leaders struggle to handle challenging feedback, staff, pupils, and parents may begin to feel unsafe in sharing openly, risking the erosion of psychological safety over time.
Many organisations stop at this stage. However, to reach Proactive Listening, the focus shifts from simply collecting data to fostering a strategic, participatory culture where stakeholders help shape the solutions.
To move towards Proactive Listening, organisations typically focus on:
-
#1 Expanding who is heard and what is asked
Focus on reaching the “quiet majority” and groups that are often underrepresented in standard surveys to ensure your data reflects the whole community. This involves moving beyond surface-level satisfaction questions to explore deeper themes like belonging, safety, and personal agency.
-
#2 Involving stakeholders in interpreting data
Instead of leaders analysing results behind closed doors, share the raw themes with staff, pupils, or parents to see if your interpretation matches their lived experience. This collaborative analysis ensures that the actions you take actually address the root causes of the feedback you received.
-
#3 Communicating progress transparently
Develop a “you said, we did, or we can’t” approach that explains the reasoning behind every decision, including why certain changes may not be possible right now. Consistent, honest updates build the psychological safety required for stakeholders to keep engaging with honesty and trust.