16 October, 2026
•
Key Education News Stories – What’s New
Keeping up with the news can be a challenge. See our summary of must-read news stories in education from the last two weeks to stay informed and empowered.
Read more
16 October, 2026
Explore the news roundup from the last two weeks to uncover the key challenges and priorities for schools across the country.
6 min read
Review commissioned by watchdog finds significant negative wellbeing impact in half of schools, writes Schools Week.
Almost nine in 10 schools warn Ofsted inspections are having a negative impact on staff wellbeing, according to a study commissioned by the watchdog to evaluate its renewed framework.
Ofsted commissioned IFF Research to carry out an independent evaluation of its new education inspection framework (EIF), for schools, early years settings, and FE colleges.
A summary of interim findings, published recently, gives the broadest look so far at how providers are finding “report card” inspections, introduced late last year. The full report is due next year.
Ofsted chief inspector Martyn Oliver said it shows the watchdog is “on the right track”, sparking backlash from unions, who branded the findings “damning” and Oliver “out of touch”.
The new findings are based on surveys of 699 education providers inspected between January and May, with 250 schools taking part. 88% of surveyed schools said their inspection had negatively affected their, or their staff’s wellbeing, with half reporting a significant impact.
Half of schools said their inspection caused an unmanageable level of workload. The report said “schools, and especially smaller schools reported that the workload…was a challenge”.
Oliver described reducing pressure on education leaders while upholding high standards for children as a “delicate balancing act”. “The data published today shows that we are on the right track,” he said. However, union bosses have renewed calls for government to review the inspection system.
Source: 9 in 10 schools say Ofsted inspections negatively impact wellbeing, report finds (schoolsweek.co.uk)
There is palpable anger this week from the profession at Ofsted’s attempts to spin the findings of its research into the impact of the new inspection framework, writes Sec-Ed.
Last week, ASCL took the extraordinary step of passing a motion of no confidence in Ofsted’s leadership and is to survey its members over potential industrial action.
The NAHT, meanwhile, has accused the inspectorate of a lack of transparancy and “once again trying to put a positive spin on a truly terrible situation”, following the publication of findings from an Ofsted-comissioned report the impact it’s inspections have on the wellbeing of schools leaders.
Chief inspector, Sir Martyn Oliver, said about the findings (mentioned in the previous story): “The data published (this week) shows that we are on the right track. We are inspecting first and foremost in the interests of children and maintaining high standards, while at the same time improving the experience for the hard-working professionals in our nurseries, schools and colleges.”
The NAHT accused Ofsted of spinning the “truly terrible” research findings while ASCL has passed a motion of no confidence in Ofsted’s leadership and is consulting its members over industrial action in protest at the “damage being done by the new inspection system”.
Paul Whiteman, NAHT general secretary, said it was “simply unacceptable” that 88% of school leaders reported that their own wellbeing or that of their staff involved in the inspection, had been negatively affected by the process.
Last month, NAHT issued a “risk to life” warning as it presented a series of inspection testimonials from school leaders to education secretary Lucy Powell and claimed that inspections are still “seriously harming leaders’ health and safety”.
Source: Ofsted’s research spin sparks motion of no confidence and strike threat (Sec-Ed.co.uk)
Heads’ leaders urge the government to put more investment into education in the Budget to prevent staff cuts and school closures, writes Tes.
One in three school leaders is considering redundancies or restructuring, an NAHT school leaders’ union survey reveals.
The union has warned that funding shortfalls risk causing “enormous damage” to children’s education if they are not addressed in the government’s upcoming Budget.
The survey of more than 5,300 NAHT members in England (74% of whom were primary school leaders) suggests 35% of leaders are aware of consultations or discussions about possible redundancies or restructures.
When asked to identify the factors contributing to possible job losses, 78% cited “insufficient funding”, while 56% said “falling rolls” in schools.
Around 14% NAHT members surveyed said there had been a formal consultation about redundancies and/or a restructure at their school or trust, while 7% cited informal consultations and 15% said there had been discussions about it.
Ahead of the upcoming autumn Budget, the NAHT is urging the government to provide immediate additional investment into schools to prevent reductions in teachers, teaching assistants and leadership teams.
“[These cuts] can cause enormous damage to children’s learning,” said Mr Whiteman. “It can affect pupil-staff ratios and lead to bigger class sizes, making it harder to ensure children – including those who need support the most – get the attention they deserve.
Source: 1 in 3 schools considering redundancies or restructuring (Tes.com)
Union leaders say lack of support for new relationships and sex education lessons is ‘disappointing’, writes Schools Week.
School staff have called for “urgent support” in teaching new relationships and sex education, after promised training grants did not materialise before the new guidance was enforced. Schools have had to teach the new curriculum from last month.
The guidance “strongly encourages” primary schools to teach about same-sex parents, and says secondaries should make sure there is an “equal opportunity” to discuss healthy same-sex and heterosexual relationships.
It also places greater emphasis on misogyny, requiring schools to teach lessons on deepfake images and sexual violence, including strangulation and sextortion.
The DfE previously said training grants would be available to some schools from early this year to help “staff tackle these challenges with confidence”.
The DfE has now said the funding has been “incorporated” into the separate violence against women and girls’ (VAWG) prevention programme, which will “test and trial the best ways to support schools” from this month until 2029. The DfE also said schools would receive the same financial support, but that they were not “formally” grants.
Union leaders have criticised the DfE, with the PSHE Association warning support was “needed urgently, not in three years’ time.” Margaret Mulholland, the SEND and inclusion specialist at ASCL, said schools “desperately need support and space to prepare” for the new lessons.
Source: New RSHE curriculum introduced without promised training grants (schoolsweek.co.uk)
School leaders voice frustration as delay to consultation on study and subject content confirmed, writes Tes.
Draft proposals for the national curriculum and GCSE subjects have been delayed until later this academic year.
The DfE had repeatedly said that it would publish the draft programmes of study and subject content for public consultation in September, with schools minister Georgia Gould publicly committing to the timeline earlier this year.
However, it is now understood that the proposals are planned to come “later this year”.
The move has been described as “disappointing” by unions, while one curriculum drafter who spoke to Tes Magazine has urged the government to stop “chopping and changing”.
The DfE has said: “We will consult on curriculum and assessment reform arrangements by the end of the year and publish the final content as soon as possible next calendar year, giving schools time and support to prepare for first teaching in September 2028.”
The government has said previously that it will implement the updated national curriculum for first teaching from September 2028 and that it will “aim” to publish the final revised national curriculum by spring 2027 – giving schools four terms to prepare for the changes.
Sarah Hannafin, head of policy at the NAHT school leaders’ union, described the timeline slip as “disappointing”.
“Even under the original proposals, schools would have had only four terms to prepare for significant curriculum changes across all subjects and year groups. If that implementation period is reduced further, schools will need additional practical support to prepare effectively,” she said. Other union leaders shared these concerns.
Source: National curriculum consultation delayed until ‘later this year’ (Tes.com)
16 October, 2026
•
Keeping up with the news can be a challenge. See our summary of must-read news stories in education from the last two weeks to stay informed and empowered.
Read more6 October, 2026
•
New OECD figures show teachers in England resign 70% more often than the international average. Our data from 110,673 school staff shows why they leave, what keeps them, and what school and trust leaders can do about it.
Read more
25 March, 2026
•
At Edurio, we're constantly looking for ways to improve the surveying experience for our community. Here's a roundup of our latest releases and updates.
Read more