What your result means

speaker icon

Voice

Regular and planned

wellbeing icon

Understanding

Comparative across groups or topics

Action

Leaders integrate into plans with accountability

Communication

Some deliberate feedback loops, slow progress

Voice

At structured listening, voice practice becomes more regular and linked to planning, though still inconsistent and seen as an add-on, with leaders showing curiosity but not yet modelling it fully. This means:

  • Surveys and pulse checks are conducted more regularly and with clearer cycles.
  • Forums (e.g., pupil, parent, staff) are used occasionally to consult on specific issues.
  • Voice is increasingly linked to planning, but still treated as an additional task.
  • Leaders begin to demonstrate curiosity (e.g., inviting questions at staff briefings or forums), but practice is inconsistent and not yet modelled as a core leadership behaviour.

Understanding

Aggregated data with some subgroup analysis begins to inform immediate priorities, though it’s still treated more as a diagnostic tool than a dialogue, meaning:

  • Aggregated data is analysed with some subgroup breakdowns.
  • Patterns are identified and linked to immediate operational concerns.
  • Leaders begin to connect insights to immediate priorities but still treat surveys as diagnostic tools rather than dialogue starters.

Action

Visible “you said, we did” examples and small initiatives emerge, but actions focus on easy wins with leaders avoiding deeper challenges. This shows up as:

  • Some systemic initiatives are trialled, though monitoring is patchy.
  • Actions are usually centralised and focused on “easy wins.”
  • Leaders take visible responsibility for a handful of issues, but avoid harder or systemic challenges.
  • “You said, we did” examples become more visible.

Communication

Leaders begin to close loops more visibly, but explanations remain minimal, and progress feels slow. How this might look in practice:

  • There are more deliberate attempts to report back (newsletters, assemblies, briefings).
  • Explanations for what cannot change are minimal.
  • Stakeholders begin to see some progress, but the pace often feels slow.
  • Leaders start to be more visible in closing loops, using briefings and assemblies.

3 steps to move from Structured Listening to Proactive Listening

While at the Structured Listening stage, data is collected and compared across groups, responses are uneven and often slow, leaving stakeholders uncertain whether change will follow. If leaders struggle to handle challenging feedback, staff, pupils, and parents may begin to feel unsafe in sharing openly, risking the erosion of psychological safety over time.

Many organisations stop at this stage. However, to reach Proactive Listening, the focus shifts from simply collecting data to fostering a strategic, participatory culture where stakeholders help shape the solutions.

To move towards Proactive Listening, focus on:

  1. #1 Expanding who is heard and what is asked

    Focus on reaching the “quiet majority” and groups that are often underrepresented in standard surveys to ensure your data reflects the whole community. This involves moving beyond surface-level satisfaction questions to explore deeper themes like belonging, safety, and personal agency.

  2. #2 Involving stakeholders in interpreting data

    Instead of leaders analysing results behind closed doors, share the raw themes with staff, pupils, or parents to see if your interpretation matches their lived experience. This collaborative analysis ensures that the actions you take actually address the root causes of the feedback you received.

  3. #3 Communicating progress transparently

    Develop a “you said, we did, or we can’t” approach that explains the reasoning behind every decision, including why certain changes may not be possible right now. Consistent, honest updates build the psychological safety required for stakeholders to keep engaging with honesty and trust.

Talk to us about embedding stakeholder feedback across your trust